Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
Medical abortions done at home using pills and an online telemedicine service appear to be just as safe and effective as those done at legal clinics, a new study has found. And it’s an approach that the Canadian health-care system may be able to learn from, the author of an accompanying editorial says.
To conduct the study, researchers analyzed the outcomes of 1,023 women in Ireland and Northern Ireland who sought medical abortion services through Women on Web, a non-profit organization that provides access to medications used to induce abortion, between 2010 and 2012. Outcomes were known for 1,000 of those women, and nearly all the women were less than nine weeks into their pregnancy.
Almost 95 per cent of the women reported successfully ending their pregnancy without surgical intervention, such as vacuum aspiration.
The researchers said less than one per cent reported side-effects like nausea and fever — comparable to the rates for women who seek medical abortions at legal clinics. Seven women needed a blood transfusion and 26 received antibiotics. No deaths were reported.
“Among women in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland, early medical abortion provided through online telemedicine was highly effective,” lead author Dr. Abigail Aiken and her co-authors wrote.
“The reported rate of successful medical abortion compares favourably with the rates of those carried out within the formal health-care system.”
While abortion medications were sent to a total of 1,636 women, followup information was only available for 1,158, the researchers said. That missing outcome data for almost one-third of the women “represents important uncertainty,” the editorial writers say, noting it is aggravated by the international laws governing telemedicine.
Millions of women around the world live in countries where self-sourced medical abortion is a potentially life-saving option, the study’s authors note, and medical abortion offers an alternative to dangerous methods, such as using sharp objects or noxious substances.
Dr. Wendy Norman, with the University of British Columbia’s department of family practice, and Bernard Dickens, a professor emeritus of health law and policy at the University of Toronto, wrote the editorial accompanying the study.
“What this study adds is an important exploration of whether women in jurisdictions with severe restrictions on abortion, but good access to high-quality health care, will self-assess and manage potential complications,” they wrote.
Importantly, Norman and Dickens said, 95 per cent of women who were advised to seek local medical care did so.
Canadian women could also benefit from using telemedicine to access medical abortion, Norman says.
Since health care is available in most of Canada’s rural areas, but abortion services aren’t always accessible, Norman suggests women in these areas could use telemedicine to connect with a doctor and safely terminate their pregnancies at home.
In their editorial, Norman and Dickens also state that while repealing legal restrictions for Irish women would be the safest and most equitable, telemedicine can offer a “reasonable alternative” in the interim.
“Until then, for the first time in history, women of all social classes in a legally restricted, yet high-resource setting have equitable access to a reasonable alternative: medical abortion guided by physicians through telemedicine.”