The fundamental flaw is organizational sprawl. The province bankrolls a patchwork of 47 separate children’s aid societies, divided along regional and religious lines that are a legacy of history, not humanity.
Our children languish in well-meaning but poorly performing silos. In today’s Ontario, why do we still have privately run children’s aid societies divided along sectarian lines, with different lineups for Catholics, Jews, Muslims, and everyone else?
The latest report from Ontario’s auditor general, and a year’s worth of stories from the Toronto Star, have exposed a pattern of neglect by the very children’s aid societies that are supposed to guard against parental neglect.
Now Premier Kathleen Wynne says she’s open to the idea. In a year-end interview, Wynne proclaimed herself ready to do whatever it takes to fix the mess — including “blowing up” the existing system if necessary:
“If we could fix what is ailing the child protection system, child welfare system in this province, by starting from scratch and blowing up what exists — I would be willing to do that, because one child’s life would be worth changing the administrative structures,” Wynne told me.
Yet it’s hard to fathom a system that is more discredited and dysfunctional. Conceived in the industrial age, today’s CAS system seems oblivious to the digital era. Without a secure foundation, the entire architecture of children’s aid is crumbling.
What seemed progressive in the late 1800s is simply regressive today. Children’s aid needs to be rescued from itself.
Wynne knows from personal experience that the system is broken. Before becoming premier, she saw up close how teachers and child protection workers failed to connect — and children fell through the cracks.
“As the minister of education, I was completely distraught at the lack of communication between school boards and children’s aid societies in some parts of the province,” Wynne said. “It is ridiculous that there wouldn’t be just an assumption that children’s aid societies and school boards would work very closely together, because teachers see issues that children’s aid societies need to know about and vice-versa.”
Adoption is another issue that cries out for reform. Before he became Canada’s governor general, David Johnston led a 2009 report for the Ontario government calling for a central adoption clearinghouse, rescuing orphans and crown wards from the labyrinth of local CAS listings that leave prospective parents out of the loop if they reside in the wrong region or aren’t the right religion.
Wynne says she has tasked her minister of minister of children and youth services, Tracy MacCharles, to come up with solutions.
“I think there are some pieces that need to be centralized, that we need more oversight of,” Wynne said in our interview. “Do we carve out a piece like adoption, for example, and have it delivered differently, have one provincial agency?”
Good question. No answer yet.
“Those are the kinds of questions that the minister is grappling with now and she’s going to bring us recommendations. Because absolutely, there has to be change, there has to be more coordination.”
The auditor general’s report catalogued failures by CAS workers to meet a seven-day deadline to start investigating child abuse cases. It takes seven months, on average, to conclude such probes — far beyond the 30-day limit. In half the cases reviewed, CAS workers neglected to make “crucial” checks of the child abuse register, creating “serious risk.”
Contrast that inertia with the government’s belated efforts to break up its broken home care system this month: Two decades ago, Ontario had 43 separate Community Care Access Centres operating at arm’s length from government. Unwieldy and unresponsive, they were consolidated into 14 CCACs a decade ago. Now, the Liberals are abolishing them entirely to take control of home care through regional health networks directly accountable to government.
“That’s the co-ordination question and the centralization question. What needs to be centralized? Where do we need to move away from that fragmentation?”
From the governor general to the auditor general, the message to the premier is clear: We need answers.