Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
But we had to hear it many times over from professional land surveyors who say the dimensions of the road allowance on the average, two-lane residential street is 66 feet, and not just in Toronto but across North America.
We asked the city if a common standard or measure is used. The answer was no, so we asked to talk to someone who could tell us how it’s done.
We eventually got a call from Naz Capano, manager of operational planning and policy with transportation services. He insisted that there is or was no common standard. But he was unable to explain how the city figures it out.
Brent Raymond said our column “was not entirely fair to Mr. Capano,” and that it “seems as though you were going out of your way to embarrass him,” adding that the typical right-of-way on older residential streets is about 20 metres, which translates to 65.6 feet.
“It was 66 feet long, comprising 100 links, so there after, land measurements were recorded in chains and links,” he said. “By the late 1800s, distances were measured in feet and inches, then feet and decimals (easier to calculate) and finally in meters.
“Most municipal streets were laid out at 66 feet wide in towns, subdivisions, etc. Modern subdivisions are now in metric and at 20 meters. Roads such as downtown Yonge St. or Bay St. are literally 66 feet building to building across their widths.
“Sixty six feet was the minimum standard not just to accommodate a road, but all the various utilities that were being introduced,” he responded, adding that the idea was to create enough room for two lanes of traffic, parking sidewalks and any work required along the periphery.
“So that’s how they came up with that standard, and it has been in existence almost since the turn of the century,” he said, adding it’s a “general standard” that can vary, particularly on narrow streets in the inner city.
“Yes I do,” he replied. “Generally, the bulk of the suburban roads are 66 feet.”
We wish we could’ve told you that last week.